Saturday, January 07, 2006

January watchlist

Watch list generated by two stock screens: one based on canslim, other based on "ideal" screen.

canslim
Symbol
Rank
Last Price
Industry Name
DBRN
1
39.76
Apparel Stores
GES
2
38.77
Textile - Apparel Clothing
NWRE
3
27.15
Networking & Communication Devices
HLEX
4
30.8
Insurance Brokers
PTRY
5
50.84
Grocery Stores
AIR
6
25.53
Aerospace/Defense Products & Services
PETS
7
14.86
Specialty Retail, Other
CRS
8
73.95
Steel & Iron
HOLX
9
38.61
Medical Appliances & Equipment
ABFS
10
44.61
Trucking
WCC
11
44.69
Electronics Wholesale
WRNC
12
27.59
Textile - Apparel Clothing
ODFL
13
27.9
Trucking
MESA
14
11.61
Regional Airlines
RVSN
15
17
Processing Systems & Products
JOSB
16
47.83
Apparel Stores
FLSH
17
35.86
Semiconductor - Memory Chips
RYL
18
77.17
Residential Construction
AML
19
38.03
REIT - Residential
VTS
20
40.18
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
EPEX
21
27.1
Independent Oil & Gas
SIRF
22
34.19
Scientific & Technical Instruments
CRDN
23
46.62
Industrial Equipment & Components
ideals
HANS
1
85.66
Beverages - Soft Drinks
LUFK
2
54.38
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
GES
3
38.77
Textile - Apparel Clothing
PKD
4
11.37
Oil & Gas Drilling & Exploration
VPI
5
56.62
Independent Oil & Gas
GRP
6
48.05
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
JLG
7
48.15
Farm & Construction Machinery
CNQ
8
52.01
Independent Oil & Gas
FWLT
9
38.96
Heavy Construction
VRTX
10
31.28
Drug Manufacturers - Other
DRQ
11
51.96
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
ACI
12
84.73
Industrial Metals & Minerals
BBBB
13
30.01
Multimedia & Graphics Software
CPTV
14
22.23
Application Software
KOMG
15
37
Data Storage Devices
ATPG
16
38.42
Independent Oil & Gas
ESRX
17
89.82
Specialized Health Services
CELG
18
68.83
Drug Manufacturers - Major
TALX
19
51.65
Business Software & Services
THOR
20
23.06
Medical Instruments & Supplies

Q1 2006: bullish until proven otherwise?

The second week of January (1st full work week) should clarify Q1. Possible scenarios: gap up Monday 1/9, which will be sold into...good for buying the dips if you're bullish. Worst case bearish scenario: intraweek reversal setting new lows of 2006.

Bullish indicators: $compx/$spx breakouts, need confirmation in $compx:tlt ratio. $NASI turning positive. See also
http://www.contrahour.com/contrahour/2006/01/if_youre_bullis.html
http://www.markethistory.com/content/content.html/8890.html http://www.markethistory.com/content/content.html/8883.html (proprietary info)

Bearish indicators: none major yet, but be on guard for breakdown beneath 1/2006 lows. Negatives include lack of 52-week high expansion, lack of volume, strength of gold and $xau and the energy complex. See also
http://www.contrahour.com/contrahour/2006/01/if_youre_bearis.html

Disco fever....history repeating?


An interesting chart: assuming that the October 2002 low in the $compx/$spx/$indu is analgous to the October 1974 low, then today = January 1978. (Correlation between 1/05-1/06 $compx and 1/77-1/78 $compx = ~0.83.) Will the markets climb the wall of worry? A lot of bearish sentiment definitely exists, but there are a few optimists.


Or assuming that October 2002 = July 1932. However, I believe if a correlation analysis is done, the value would be low. Even if these prior analogies are wrong, notice the cup and handles in the 1930s and 1970s that preceded the rallies.

The compx shall lead the way...



The above chart shows the history of the $compx, $spx and $indu from 2/1971, when the $compx started @ 100. ($indu was adjusted to equal 100, while $spx = 94 during 2/1971).

Assuming that 2000-200? is analagous to 1970-1979, all three indices will be mired in trading ranges. However, note that the $compx is the only "mechanical" index as no selection committee mulls over the composition of the $compx. Interestingly, $compx convincingly broke out of its 1970s-trading range in July 1979, while $spx didn't break out of its range until July 1980 and $indu until January 1983. Why is this the case?

As $compx is the only mechanical index, $compx better reflected the movement of the market away from the industrial-70s to the tech-80s. Note that during this period the performance of companies like AMGN and INTC (and Wang/Lotus/etc) were captured by the $compx and not by the $spx or $indu.

Lesson: when $compx recaptures its old highs/breaks out of the current range, many technical analysts may talk of "waiting for confirmation in the $indu or $spx." The above chart demonstrates that investors waiting for confirmation of the $compx breakout in 1978 would have missed a 15%-40% run-up in the $compx. The $compx/ndx should be able to pick up the stocks that will lead the post-tech bull run whenever that may be. Also, note the extreme volatility of 1979-1982 following the calm of 1976-1977. The death of the bear was violent.

Buying the IXIC only when IXIC > 10d av and > 30d av

A graphical representation of the returns for the following strategy:
  1. On any given trading day, calculate 10d sma and 30d sma of IXIC. Buy at today's close if IXIC > 10d sma and 30d sma.
  2. If step one is not true, stay in cash.
Note: this strategy lost money in 2000-2002, though outperforming basic buy/hold strategy.

Friday, January 06, 2006

More tidbits on timing.

From 2/5/71 to 1/5/06 (close), there have been 8812 trading days for the IXIC.
  1. On any given day, the average change of the next day (t+1) is +0.0427%. This will be the "control." Cumulative return: 2205%.
  2. On any given day t, when IXIC close > 10d average and > 30d average (i.e. an uptrend), the average t+1 change is +0.145%. 4287 days (t) when IXIC > 10d av and > 30d av., 2645 t+1 days = up and 1623 t+1 = down. Cumulative t+1 return +41707%. Annualized return: 42.5%.
  3. On any given day t, when IXIC close <> 10d av and > 30d av. Cumulative t+1 return -96.4%. Annualized return: -26.7%.
  4. On any given day t, when IXIC close <> 10d average (proxy for bounce in downtrend), the average t+1 change +0.098%. 828 days (t) when IXIC > 10d av and <>
  5. On any given day t, when IXIC close > 30d average and <> 10d av and <>
Moral of the story: don't catch a falling knife and stay with the trend.

ONT: if this week's run-up has made you feel speculative...


Interesting speculative stock, ONT, which develops video of network software. Could this be the next NTRI, HANS, BOOM? PS, don't forget the stops.

Tuesday, January 03, 2006

Doug Kass: 2006 may not be good

Another forecast for 2006. http://www.thestreet.com/p/comment/investing/10259674.html

Naturally, DK does not expect all forecasts to be correct. To him, 2006 does not look good. Likely that many other fund managers share his belief (not necessarily a majority). As a result, look for rallies being sold into...unless a strong breakout through 52-week highs.

Summary: Japan good, US vulnerable to bad surprises.

******

Every December, I take a page from former Morgan Stanley strategist Byron Wien and prepare a list of 25 possible surprises for the coming year.

These are not intended to be predictions, but rather events that have a reasonable chance of occurring, despite the general perception that the odds are very long. I call these "possible improbable" events.

The real purpose of this endeavor is to consider positioning a portion of my portfolio in accordance with outlier events -- with large payoffs. After all, Wall Street research is still very much convention and groupthink, despite the reforms over the past several years.

Mainstream and consensus expectations are just that, and, in most cases, are deeply imbedded in today's stock prices. If I succeed in making you think about outlier events, the exercise has been worthwhile.

About a fifth of last year's predicted surprises actually happened, which was down from the prior two years -- nearly one-half of our prognostications proved prescient in 2004 and about one-third in 2003.

One firm's 2006 outlook/game plan.

Found via google blog search of "2006 SPX"

http://www.truenorthmarketdiary.com/2005/12/weekly_wrap_out.html

http://www.truenorthmarketdiary.com/files/weekly_wrap_27.12.05.pdf

Monday, January 02, 2006

Will the real market history please stand up?


As a follow-up to a prior missive.....everyone knows of this chart (the progess of the DJ 30 in nominal terms, log scale):


Here's another chart:

(in log scale)

The above chart is the DJIA (monthly close) divided by the monthly CPI (CPI-U average of all US urban areas), ie the real/inflation-adjusted DJIA (ex. reinvested dividends).

Notice how from 1966 to 1982, a period of market consolidation in the nominal chart, the DJIA DECLINED in real terms (ex. dividends) due to the rampant inflation c. Vietnam War/OPEC shocks. Naturally the inclusion of dividends changes the investment return over time (see "The Triumph of the Optimists" or Jeremy Siegel's Stocks for the Long Run). Yet the message is clear....stock returns have far outpaced inflation since 1982. However, the "market" (as poorly represented by the DJIA) can decline IN REAL TERMS (not merely consolidate) for years and stocks held for "the long-term" can undergo severe drawdowns.

Is 1999 = 1966? Probably not. Is 2006 = 1982? Probably not.

However as 2006 unfolds, an open mind must consider ALL possibilities, both good and bad. FYI, assuming DJIA/CPI returns to 1966 levels (an absolute worst case scenario) DJIA = 5800. Ouch.

Bottom line: Break of October 02/March 03 lows will be very, very bad. Hopefully, 2006 will see a bullish cup/handle break upwards.

A good scientist doesn't change his ruler.

Random thoughts: One thing that troubles me about long, long-term technical analysis is that the broad market indices have changed so much over the years that historical data is marginally useful.

Dow Jones 30 have changed.....does the DJ30 from 1950 have any relation to the DJ30 from today? My answer: No, because the financials weren't represented in major indexes from the past.

The modern SPX is only ~17 years old.....the old SPX and its chart cited so often bore more resemblance to the old Dow Jones 30. Today's SPX has over 20% devoted to financials....the percentage of financials represented in the major indexes from 1950?

Ideal solution: Russell 1000 back-calculated to 1929. Anyone have time or the inclination to pay Russell to do that?

******
History Highlights [back to top]
1923 -- Standard de Poor's develops its first stock market indicators. The new stock indices cover 26 industry groups and 233 companies. Also, S&P introduces base-weighted aggregate technique to gauge stock market performance.
1926 -- Standard & Poor's creates a 90 Stock Composite Price Index, comprising 50 Industrials, 20 Rails and 20 Utilities. The new composite has a base period of 1926=100 and is calculated and published weekly. Historical values are available going back to 1918. The "233" and the industry group indices are re-based to 1926=100 and are calculated and published weekly.
1928 -- Standard & Poor's 90 Stock Composite Price Index is calculated and published daily.
1941 -- The "233" grows to 416, comprising 72 industry sub-groups. The new "416" and the 90 Stock Composite are re-based to 1935-39=100
1957 -- The "416" becomes the Standard & Poor's 500 Composite Stock Price Index. Thanks to technological advancements, computers are introduced and permit the "500" to be calculated and disseminated at one-minute intervals throughout the trading day. In order to create a lengthy historical time series, the new "500" is linked to the 90 Stock Composite Price Index-daily S&P 500 Index prices become available back to 1928. The original "233" and "90" stock indices have evolved into the modern "500". The "500" now consists of 425 Industrials, 60 Utilities and 15 Rails, and has a base period of 1941-43=10.
1976 -- Effective July 1, the "500" is restructured to become a composite consisting of 400 Industrials, 40 Utilities, 40 Financials and 20 Transportation stocks. Up to this point, only New York Stock Exchange issues have been included in the "500". The restructuring introduces Over-The-Counter and American Stock Exchange issues into the computation.
1983 -- Effective November 30, Standard & Poor's revises the "500" to reflect the American Telephone & Telegraph (AT&T) divestiture. The seven regional telephone companies spun off by AT&T are added to the 40 Utilities group, replacing two electric, two gas and three independent telephone utility stocks. Parent AT&T is kept in the miscellaneous category of the 400 Industrials group.
1986 -- On June 13, Standard & Poor's begins disseminating S&P 500 Index values on a 15-second interval basis versus the previous one-minute calculation.
1988 -- Effective January 1, Standard & Poor's calculates the Total Return -- return including reinvestment of dividends -- on the S&P 500 Index on a daily basis. Previously total return numbers were only available based on monthly reinvestment.
1988 -- Effective April 6, the S&P 500 is restructured to remove the "limits" set on the four major industry groups. As a result, from this point on, the 400 Industrials, 40 Utilities, 40 Financials and 20 Transportations are allowed to "float". Substitutions can be made between categories, permitting S&P to respond more quickly to shifts in representation of major market sectors.
1989 -- On February 8, Standard & Poor's removes RJR Nabisco from the S&P 500, reflecting the completion of the largest corporate takeover in U.S. history. RJR's huge market value of $22 billion is replaced by $2.3 billion First Union, a regional bank based in North Carolina.
1989 -- Effective October 1, Standard & Poor's begins its "preannouncement" policy. Whenever possible, S&P will announce additions and deletions up to five business days in advance of the actual change in the Index. The policy change is designed to ease order imbalances that typically happen to stocks just added to the 500.
1992 -- In May 1992 S&P/BARRA Growth & Value style indices are introduced. Based on price/book ratios, these indices divide the S&P 500 Index into two mutually exclusive indices representing a 50/50 split of the 500's market value according to price/book characteristics.

2006. Meaning among confusion.

Good quote via Raymond James (Investment Strategyby Jeffrey Saut, note link probably won't stay current) via Big Picture.
******
(Quoted from: http://www.raymondjames.com/inv_strat.htm December 2005)
The call for this week: As commodity trader Hunt Taylor opines, “You have to pay the most attention to market moves that seem to make no sense, because those are the moves that contain the most information. They will make sense to you later on, but only as prices are very different from today.” We think the concurrent rally in gold AND the dollar over the past few months is such a “makes no sense” move. One of the two is lying! Our sense is that it is the dollar, which we expect to lose its tailwind in the New Year. Meanwhile, gold’s strength infers upcoming inflation that will be greater than most think. Or as Bill Fleckenstein notes, “In a social democracy with a fiat currency, all roads lead to inflation.” We continue to invest accordingly.
******
2006 will be about resolving the conflicts of 2005.
  1. If crude oil drops, is that a negative as it may infer weak economic growth?
  2. What is up with gold? Is the rise of gold a harbinger of inflation?
  3. What about the ~2 billion Indians/Chinese/Brazilians/etc. joining the global labor market, is this deflationary?
  4. How will the yield curve conundrum unwind?


Does volume speak volumes?

A list of stocks that satisfy the following criteria: 1) average daily volume during the past two weeks volume divided by average daily volume during the past year = as high as possible; 2) vol. 2wks/vol 52wks > 3; and 3) price change during the last month > 0.

Some of these name = takeovers (NXTP). Other names = potential blow-off top (TRE). Other names = potential breakouts (RGEN, MPWR/MPWRE). Other names = potential turnaround plays (NMGC, DVW).

Name, Avg. Daily Vol. Last 2 Weeks/Avg. Daily Vol. Last Year
HAUP 20.59
NEOL 9.61
STAA 8.04
NMGC 7.1
MUSE 5.87
MPWR 5.76
IFO 5.36
TRE 4.86
GROW 4.85
MXO 4.83
RGEN 4.71
NXTP 4.7
TSCM 4.39
CESV 4.37
RACK 4.34
DVW 3.85
GTE 3.84
SIFY 3.64
SLW 3.6
NWRE 3.23
EGHT 3.21
SSP 3.2
PAY 3.17
AGIX 3.08
MEMY 3.06

tag: volume, year end

 

Google